Loading...

Other exclusions?


reply
Paul Musille Sept. 13, 2017, 3:47 p.m. PDT
@Hishamodien Hoosain

Yes, a fruit, being part of a plant, is in scope!

reply
Hishamodien Hoosain Sept. 13, 2017, 3:45 p.m. PDT
Would a fruit be excluded? The rules says you looking for a plant but would a fruit of a certain plant be excluded

reply
Paul Musille June 28, 2017, 8:04 a.m. PDT
Thanks for the questions, Ben.

You are correct that sugarcane, beets, and corn have not been specifically excluded like Stevia and Monk Fruit. They may however, score lower in the novelty judging criteria than other entries.

While the goal is indeed to "find a "plant-based natural sweetener that has few or no calories", the challenge is is non-scientific in nature. Given this, it's likely that a person sharing a story may not know the specific calorie content of the plant they are describing, which is why it's not included in the judging criteria.

The submission form does ask about the cost of the plant in context of how it is normally obtained (if bought), but this is not a specific factor in the judging criteria and won't alter scoring.

reply
Ben June 27, 2017, 9:14 p.m. PDT
Similarly, is cost a factor?

reply
Ben June 27, 2017, 9:38 a.m. PDT
The Guidelines page states in many places that the sweetener should be "derived from plants other than Stevia or Lo Han Guo (Monk Fruit)" and these are the only two excluded under the Novelty criteria. What about sweeteners derived from sugarcane, beets, or corn?

Also, while the challenge is trying to find a "plant-based natural sweetener that has few or no calories," the guidelines make no mention of caloric content and that is apparently not a judging criteria. Is that accurate, or are the submissions going to be judged against undisclosed criteria like these?