Our Goal: Catalyze a Breakthrough Solution to Design and Build the World’s First Compact, Autonomy-Enabled Rescue Aircraft that is Safe and Simple to Fly.
We’ve created a three-year global competition bringing the world’s brightest minds together to focus on a singular mission: Saving Lives.
Teams participating will design and build the first autonomy-enabled Emergency Response Flyer, a high-tech aircraft that will help response teams reach people, places and crises faster and easier than ever before.
Winners will save countless lives. They’ll also receive $2+ Million in prizes.
A Singular Mission: Saving Lives
We’re building the world’s first-ever autonomy-enabled Emergency Response Flyer. And we want you to join us.
Imagine a world where every first responder has life-saving aerial capability enabled by compact size and autonomous operations. With support from Boeing, NASA, RTX, and countless partners, our work will make emergency response aircraft accessible to all.
In an Emergency Situation Every Second Counts
The difference between triumph and tragedy in emergency rescue scenarios often rests on our ability to move towards the danger, not away. That’s why we’re building a new high-tech aircraft that will help emergency response teams reach people, places, and crises faster and easier than ever before.
The Challenge: The State of Emergency is Changing. The State of Emergency Response is Not.
Emergency responders face significant challenges getting people, supplies, and medical teams in and out of hazardous situations. Gridlocked traffic, narrow streets, forest fires, thick brush, and vast rivers and mountain ranges create obstacles to swift and effective response efforts and can leave communities vulnerable during times of need.
Health Crises
In the U.S. alone, nearly 4.5 million people live in "ambulance deserts." In a medical emergency, they may have to wait 25 minutes or more for an emergency crew to arrive.
Natural Disasters and Climate Change
In 2022, there were more than 380 natural disasters worldwide - affecting 185 million people and resulting in the loss of over 30,000 lives.
These extreme weather patterns and climate events have skyrocketed in the past half-century, while our response capabilities have remained stagnant.
There is a Gap between What Aircraft Can Do and What First Responders Need.
Helicopters
Since helicopters can’t fly to all places or reach those in tight quarters, helicopter rescues can be very difficult or impossible to complete. Add in the high cost of acquisition and operation and couple that with a pilot shortage, and helicopter rescue response is often inaccessible to many when they need it most.
Drones
In search and rescue, drones can complete the search portion of the mission, but not the rescue.
The Answer: Create the World’s First Compact, Autonomy-Enabled Rescue Aircraft that is Safe and Simple to Fly.
Today’s technology enables simpler, smaller, more reliable, and more versatile aerospace solutions.
Advancements in obstacle sense and avoid technologies combined with state estimation and behavior management algorithms have enabled reliable autonomy.
Electrification has enabled simplified, efficient power and novel airframe designs. With significantly fewer parts, these aircraft can require less maintenance. Plus, electric aircraft are quick to fly—cutting down critical emergency response time.
Now is the Time: We have the Resources. We Just Need The Resourceful.
Your talent and unique vision will help us create the breakthrough emergency response solution we desperately need today. Join GoAERO and start saving lives now.
Guidelines
*Stage 2 Registration Documents are now available! Even if you did not participate in Stage 1, we invite and encourage you to participate in Stage 2. Registration documents can be found here, and if you have questions, please contact us at info@goAEROprize.com.
GoAERO
GoAERO is a set of three competitions fostering development and operation of single-occupant scale, affordable, robust, beneficial systems to serve the public good. These aircraft have invaluable capabilities for addressing challenges posed by natural disasters and climate change, humanitarian crises, medical emergencies, and other situations of people in distress. GoAERO aims to inspire aviation technology, beyond transportation, to benefit humankind. GoAERO aircraft don’t wear running shoes or fancy chauffeur gloves; they get important jobs done and show up ready to help wearing a badge and rugged boots. GoAERO systems are:
Productive: Deploy on site and keep working day-in and day-out, reliably and efficiently.
Versatile: All-theater, multi-environment, and robust so the important jobs are trusted to get done no matter what.
Capable: Precision to complete unique tasks and with the agility to react and adapt to unpredictable environments.
The final Fly-Off event features three separate scored missions to be flown (with manikin stand-ins for human occupants) testing specific relevant skills and capabilities that are applicable to a wide variety of possible real-world scenarios, for example:
Retrieve an injured person from under a forest canopy
Deliver (or retrieve) a firefighter on a burning hillside
Retrieve a drowning victim at the beach
Get a first responder to the scene in a dense urban environment (building, signs, wires, tight spaces)
Get water and rations to communities cut off by natural disaster
Evacuate flood victims
Douse a nascent wildfire
Rescue someone who has fallen through the ice on a frozen lake
Locate / identify / observe an emergency situation
Act as a fire truck “ladder extension”
etc.
…And do all this in difficult conditions: bad weather, chaotic (uncooperative) air traffic and obstacles, unknown terrain, etc.
Productivity
Quickly deploy the system, then continuously ferry payload
Drive on site, quickly get the system ready to fly, then make multiple trips to move as much payload as possible.
Adversity
Take off and land in difficult conditions
Land, ground pause, and take off at sandy, sloped, wet/rainy, windy and unsurveyed sites.
Maneuvering
Tightly maneuver while avoiding obstacles
Run a slalom course featuring four obstacles and a spot landing, with and without payload in each direction.
“Autonomy-enabled” means systems that can have broad impact for good by requiring low workload and little skill / training such that they are accessible to existing stakeholders who can remain focused on their mission instead of vehicle operation. In the GoAERO competition, automation can enable optimized performance and reduced errors, improving mission scores, and autonomy is also explicitly rewarded with bonus points for the top prize.
While many existing aircraft are capable of accomplishing these missions, GoAERO will spur new developments that showcase to users, industry, government, and the public the art of the possible with today's technology (affordability, portability, storability, ease of use, versatility, etc.), which may one day lead to fieldable solutions.
Schedule
April 8, 2024: Comment period closes
GoAERO solicits and welcomes comments on the Fly-Off rulebook. Use this form to comment.
December 11, 2024: GoAERO Stage 1 submission deadline
Up to ten $10,000 Stage 1 winners are selected based on a digital-only submission describing the technical approach and project plan. Stage 1 submissions are judged on:
40% technical approach: Describe the hardware and software you plan to bring to the Fly-Off, describe its sufficient performance, and substantiate that it will perform as claimed.
25% project plan: Show that you will safely and dependably execute up through finishing the Fly-Off and have the necessary resources.
20% competitiveness: Show that your system has been developed and optimized for competitive performance specifically at the GoAERO Fly-Off.
15% clarity: Make your submission organized, succinct, and easy to follow.
September 30, 2025: GoAERO Stage 2 submission deadline
Up to eight $40,000 Stage 2 winners are selected based on Stage 1 content (with updates for those who participated in Stage 1) plus a show of concept validation. In addition to any other key subsystem validation you may wish to include, concept validation must also include evidence (with uncut video, including payload weighing) of the aircraft or representative prototype flying, and it must be at least 35% size scale and carrying a dynamic scale payload weight (~5.4 lb / 2.4 kg for 35% scale) on a minimum flight profile of taking off, flying 100 ft away, and returning to land at the same location. Submissions lacking this required minimum flight capability demonstration will not be scored. Stage 2 submissions are judged on the same criteria as Stage 1 submissions, with an additional 40% for concept validation (i.e., 140% total).The Stage 2 submission will also require explanations of safety procedures in place for the validation flights.
Teams can join the competition at any time and do not need to have participated in previous rounds to compete in the next round. Teams also do not need to win a previous stage prize in order to continue into the next round of the competition, although we encourage Teams to enter sooner rather than later so that they can enjoy the Benefits provided to GoAERO Teams and have the ability to compete to win early-round prizes and publicity.
June 5, 2026 - December 15, 2026: GoAERO Fly-Off qualifying period
Participation in Stage 1 or 2 is not required to participate in the Fly-Off.
Qualifying for participation in the GoAERO Fly-Off requires an aircraft, with registration and airworthiness certificate, that has demonstrated controlled flight capability with full payload. Competitors must submit video (uncut) of the aircraft carrying a full-weight payload (video to include payload weighing) on a controlled outdoor flight consisting of at least a taking off from an area the size of or smaller than one of the defined operations zones, flying at least 300 ft away out of ground effect, and returning to a controlled landing at the same operations zone.
Under no circumstances will participants be allowed to fly at the GoAERO Fly-Off who have not proven this controlled flight capability at least 30 days prior to the competition. This is a hard deadline, with no exceptions.
Qualifying and registration will require additional documentation and actions as related to both event logistics and to safety, for example disclosing information on internal safety reviews and operating limitations.
Early application for qualifying is advantageous since registration may be capped. Early application also allows time to revise and amend a potentially non-qualifying package.
February 5, 2027: GoAERO Fly-Off event
The up to 3-day GoAERO Fly-Off features three separate missions testing specific skills and capabilities relevant to public good missions. See GoAERO Fly-Off Rulebook for rules and mission details. The best performer in each completed mission wins a prize of $150,000, and the best aggregate performance earns the $1,000,000 top prize.
Additional prizes will be awarded:
$100,000 RTX Disruptor Prize for “disruptive advancement of the state of the art.”
$100,000 Autonomy Prize for “achievements enabled by transferable automation, algorithms, and/or sensing developments.”
Rules and requirements may change at any time up to and including the final event. This includes the nature of missions or even the number of missions and scoring parameters.
TEAM SAFETY RESPONSIBILITY
Competition teams are solely responsible for the safe operation of their vehicles. This includes the safety of the operator, the vehicle, and any object or person on the ground. The organizers of the competition will not assess the adequacy of the submission from a safety perspective. The competition team is solely responsible for identifying all risks, mitigating them to the maximum extent possible, and determining if the residual risk is acceptable.
GoAERO Fly-Off Rulebook
1. Missions
The competition features three separate missions to be performed by single-occupant aircraft with a 125 lb (57 kg) manikin “Alex” stand-in for the occupant. The highest ranked performer completing each mission wins a prize for that mission. The top prize is awarded based on aggregate performance in the missions.
1.1. Productivity mission
Demonstrate the ability to a) quickly deploy the system and b) continuously ferry payload. Ranked by ratio of total payload weight ferried to total system weight.
Operations zone (OZ)
“The Depot.” Hard surface, trapezoid 100 ft (30 m) long, 5 ft (1.5 m) wide at the narrow end closest to the end line and 30 ft (9 m) wide at the far end.
Profile
Deployment phase
Start with the aircraft, operating crew, and all equipment for the mission (excluding payloads) on the ground transport vehicle, meeting highway weight, length, width, and height limits.
Drive to the mission course along a prescribed route, which may involve inclines, turns, bumps, moderate minimum speeds, etc. The deployment timer starts upon arrival at the course at the OZ when all points of ground contact of the ground transport vehicle have crossed into the lane surrounding the OZ. Deployment actions, such as crew leaving highway-legal seatbelted positions, may not begin before this time.
Prepare the aircraft for flight. One pause of the deployment timer and, if started, the mission timer (see below) is to be used for unhurried touch-free pre-flight checks and inspections to verify proper setup (with the touch-free participation of other crew and payload handlers allowed). Teams may also use this pause to move the unloaded ground transport vehicle out of the OZ or away from course and move and set up ground control equipment in the designated operating crew area. The maximum duration of the pause is 20 minutes.
Flight phase
The mission timer begins at the first of either liftoff or the deployment timer reaching 30 minutes.
Empty of payload, fly a segment well out of ground effect. A segment is three laps, each from behind the base line, across the end line approximately one quarter mile away, and returning across the base line.
Return to the OZ and touch down.
Load any payload(s) of choice. Payload(s) may vary for each loaded segment and may be any combination of
up to twelve 6 ft (1.8 m) lengths of #5 rebar (~6.2 lb / 2.8 kg per piece), and/or
up to three 40 lb (18 kg) sandbags (sandbags have no handles).
Take off, fly a segment with payload, and land at the OZ.
Gently unload all payload. Unloaded payload may not be in contact with any system element during flight (including prior to the first segment).
Repeat the process of flying segments, alternating empty and with payload(s).
The mission timer stops at 90 minutes. The last load counts at touchdown (does not have to be unloaded before the timer expires).
To complete the mission, the minimum total payload weight ferried is 1250 lb (567 kg).
Maximum 4 payload handlers / pit crew. They must be at least 50 ft (15 m) from the OZ borders any time the aircraft is in flight and may never get within 3 ft (0.9 m) of still-moving systems not enclosed or blocked by static aircraft structure as first point of contact. Payloads, tools, and equipment must remain in the OZ or on the aircraft.
Expect mission parameters to be revised as the event site allows.
Instead of deploying into the OZ, teams may elect for the first takeoff to be directly off of the transport vehicle, which may be parked in the OZ or within a 10 ft (3 m) wide lane bordering all but the short sides of the OZ.
Total system weight for ranking includes all equipment used during the mission, including aircraft, extra fuel/batteries, parts, tools/equipment, consumables, etc. It excludes the ground transport vehicle (if not contacted after the first liftoff), operating crew, ground control equipment, and payloads. The first pair of human payload handlers used counts as 50 lbs (23 kg), with any additional individuals as 50 lbs each.
Productivity mission course illustration (not to scale).
1.2. Adversity mission
Demonstrate the ability to take off and land in difficult conditions. Ranked by fastest time.
Operations zones
“The Base.” Hard surface, 25 ft (7.6 m) wide by 50 ft (15 m) long.
“The Pit.” 12 ft x 12 ft (3.7 m) loose dry sand. Sand extends beyond OZ borders and well beyond is surrounded by short walls intended to contain anything strewn by downwash within the OZ environment. Additional elements creating low visibility conditions may be present.
“The Hill.” 11 ft x 11 ft (3.4 m) on an elevated platform at a ~12 degree incline, surfaced with carpet.
“The Flood.” Surface of a ~24 ft (7.3 m) diameter, ~18 in (0.5 m) deep pool with simulated moderate (~1/8th inch / 4 mm per hour) rainfall. Touching / resting on the floor of the pool is allowed. Landing must include momentarily touching or popping a balloon floating on the pool surface anchored to limit movement to a ~6 ft (1.8 m) radius circle.
“The Tornado.” Hard surface, 15 ft x 15 ft (4.6 m) with strong, non-uniform wind currents. Elements used to create these conditions are placed no closer than 18 ft (5.5 m) from the center of the zone.
“The Unknown.” Hard surface, 60 ft x 25 ft (18 m x 7.6 m). Obstacles up to 3 ft (0.9 m) tall and not in direct view of the operating crew are distributed such that a minimum 15 ft (4.6 m) diameter area remains clear of obstacles. Obstacles may be re-distributed before or during the mission except whenever the aircraft may be en route to the OZ.
Profile
Start at The Base with Alex on board. Timer starts at liftoff.
Overfly a tall (~30 ft / 9 m) marker located up to 100 ft (30 m) away from the OZs.
Fly to a different OZ.
Touch down at the new OZ and remain touched down for a minimum of 2 contiguous minutes.
Take off and repeat (take off, overflight of marker, touch down, ground pause) for each of the remaining OZs not yet flown to, in any order.
Timer stops after touchdown back at The Base. Maximum time allowed: 30 minutes.
1.3. Maneuvering mission
Demonstrate the ability to tightly maneuver while avoiding obstacles. Ranked by fastest time.
Operations zones
“The Base.” Hard surface, 25 ft (7.6 m) wide by 50 ft (15 m) long.
“The Spot.” Hard surface, 8 ft x 8 ft (2.4 m), with entrance and exit through a 28 ft (8.5 m) wide by 30 ft (9 m) high gate with threshold ~4 ft (1.2 m) from one edge. May be shielded, above and/or to the sides, by structures designed to degrade GNSS quality.
Profile
Take off with Alex from The Base. Timer starts at liftoff.
Fly the course (forward direction):
Navigate around (left turn) obstacle 1 (vertical pylon), staying above 50 ft (15 m) AGL while passing abeam the obstacle in the outbound direction.
Navigate around (right turn) obstacle 2 (vertical pylon), keeping below 35 ft (11 m) (highest point of aircraft) while passing between obstacles 2 and 4.
Navigate around (left turn) or over obstacle 3 (50 ft / 15 m high virtual wall).
Navigate around (right turn) obstacle 4 (same as obstacle 2).
Land on The Spot.
Gently unload payload.
Take off and fly course in reverse direction, no payload.
Touch down back in The Base.
Fly course in forward direction, no payload, and touch down at The Spot.
Re-load Alex.
Fly course in reverse direction, with payload, and land in The Base. Timer stops on touchdown. Maximum time allowed: 20 minutes.
The timer is stopped while any part of the aircraft is touching The Spot, up to a maximum of 4 minutes per visit.
Obstacles and The Spot surface are placed within up to a 75 ft (23 m) width and roughly spaced over a total distance of 225 to 325 ft (69 to 99 m).
Obstacles will be physical as far as is practical, with virtual extensions and interpolations. Contact is allowed with obstacles and The Spot gate.
Maximum three payload handlers for The Spot operations. Payload handlers are all that are allowed in addition to aircraft and payload (no additional tools or equipment). Payload handlers must be at least 50 ft (15 m) from the OZ borders any time the aircraft is in flight and may never get within 3 ft (0.9 m) of still-moving systems not enclosed or blocked by static aircraft structure as first point of contact.
Maneuvering mission course illustration (not to scale).
2. Additional rules and information
2.1. Spirit of the competition
Just like real-world missions require adaptability, teams should expect the unexpected at the event and should not expect mission conditions, layouts, or elements to be exactly as practiced, precisely defined prior to the event, or exactly the same for each competitor attempt. Course element coordinates will not be provided, and teams may not pre-survey courses. Teams are expected to strive for competitiveness. Just as with sporting events, chance, weather, and other factors outside of competitor control may play a role in determining results.
2.2. Primary mission payload “Alex”
“Alex” is a manikin stand-in for a human with approximate stature of 5’5” (1.65 m) and a nominal weight of 125 lb (57 kg), plus clothing (to represent about half of a fieldable product minimum payload capability to reduce competition cost and logistics). Alex must be carried in some plausible reasonable position with plausible restraints for an active or passive human occupant.
Alex (specifically, Simulaids #149-1390) and other payloads are provided at the event.
2.3. Transport and staging
The total system, including all operating crew, the aircraft, fuel, support equipment, etc., but excluding payloads, payload handlers, and specialized staging equipment, must arrive at the competition properly secured and fitting on a single US highway-legal ground transport vehicle (trailers allowed), meeting weight, length, and width requirements and a 13.5 ft (4.1 m) height limit. Teams should be prepared to stage for mission attempts within two hours of access to the competition site since prior-day access is not guaranteed.
Whether repurposing the ground transport vehicle or using some other additional separate equipment (tugs, towbars, dollies, etc.), teams must be able to efficiently stage and unstage their system to and from mission courses. This requires the ability to:
Move the system a distance over a hard surface at a minimum of a 2.5 mph (4 km/h) (average walking pace), but more desirably towed or driven,
Set up at the mission starting operations zone and ground station area and be ready to fly within fifteen minutes of arriving at the course, with the timer starting after 10 minutes regardless, and
Clear the course within ten minutes of finishing a mission attempt.
Teams should plan to include the ability to clearly “safe” the system any time it is not attempting a mission, including assurance of radio equipment not transmitting.
2.4. Top prize points
The top prize is based on a system of completion points, rank points, and bonus points.
Completion points
Teams must earn 30 or more completion points to win the top prize.
25 points per mission completed.
10 points per mission partially completed. Partial completion criteria are:
Productivity: Total weight of ferried payloads of at least 700 lb (318 kg).
Adversity: Any one OZ or cycle incomplete or omitted.
Maneuvering: Either a) mis-flying any one obstacle once or b) omitting the final flight leg (reverse direction with payload).
Rank points
Teams with fewer than 30 completion points (those not eligible to win the top prize) are omitted from rankings used for determining rank points.
10 points to the highest ranked team of each mission.
4 points to the 2nd highest ranked team of each mission.
Bonus points
Operating crew: 2 points for each mission fully or partially completed using only a single operating crew member (excluding staging operations). Capped at 4 points.
Workload: 2 points for each mission fully completed, or 3 points for each mission partially completed, with no more than 30 total seconds of operator inputs. An additional 2 points are awarded if accomplished with zero operator inputs. Inputs whenever payload handlers may be active are ignored. Capped at 9 points.
Deployment: 6 points if deployed in under 2 minutes, or 4 points if under 5 minutes, on the Productivity mission if total weight of ferried payloads is at least 125 lb (57 kg).
Ties are settled first by who has at least partially completed more missions, then by who has the superior ranking in more missions, then by points with caps on bonus points removed. If still tied, the prize is split.
2.5. Penalties
Single penalties – 20% completion points reduction per instance:
Going partially out of bounds of an OZ (some part of the system still touches inside the OZ).
Double penalties – 40% completion points reduction per instance:
Other illegal contact outside of OZs or explicitly allowed mission elements.
Piercing or otherwise intentionally damaging payloads.
Any penalty results in no ranking for that mission. The standard penalty for otherwise violating rules or not meeting a requirement is a void mission attempt. Gross violations of the rules, unsportsmanlike or unethical conduct, or unsafe behavior, for example any excursion beyond course boundaries, results in disqualification and nullification of all mission attempts.
2.6. Field of play
Layout, dimensions, definitions, and demarcation of OZs, ground station, and other mission elements are approximate.
It should not be assumed that areas outside of OZs are smooth, level, or free of obstructions.
Teams will not be provided with precise surveyed locations of OZs and mission elements.
Teams should not expect access to courses prior to mission attempts.
Mission courses will include additional explicit boundaries (including altitude limits) that may be close to mission elements, limiting wide turns.
Multiple teams may be airborne simultaneously, attempting the same or different missions, separated by course boundaries.
Neither aircraft parts nor payloads may touch the ground, obstacles, or mission elements anywhere outside the operations zone unless otherwise explicitly allowed. Where explicitly allowed, any contact must not result in the element being damaged, toppled, etc. i.e., it must remain in place and functional for the contact to still be legal.
2.7. Uncrewed operations
No human pilot, crew, or passengers are allowed on board during flight. Total operating crew on the ground is limited to 2 persons for staging, deploying, and operating the aircraft in all missions (excludes payload handlers, but includes a visual observer if one operator has obstructed vision).
Ground areas will be designated at each mission course for operating crew, outside expected aircraft flight paths but within line of sight. Anyone in or in communication with the designated area is considered operating crew.
Teams are responsible for ensuring that risks of excursion beyond course boundaries are mitigated, with consideration that there may not be a clean RF or GNSS signal environment.
2.8. Takeoff and landing definition
Lifting off means no part of the aircraft or payload remains in contact with the OZ.
Touching down or landing means a load-bearing part of the aircraft (bears a significant portion of aircraft and payload weight) is in contact with the OZ and the entire flight system is a single unit.
Landings must not result in damage to the aircraft, payload, or OZ. All parts, components, and assemblies must remain intact, attached to the aircraft, and in the OZ.
2.9. Mission order and attempts
Adding and removing accessory equipment between mission attempts is allowed, but the same core aircraft and its elements (propulsion, powered lift, control effectors, lifting surfaces, etc.) must be included for all missions.
The total number of entrants, which mission(s) they plan to attempt, event schedule and calendar, and other factors will determine the order of mission attempts for each competitor. Reattempts to achieve completion or a better score may be available but are also dependent on these factors. Performance points and mission prizes may also be diminished or unavailable on reattempts. In order to allow for a denser schedule of mission attempts at the event, the maximum time allowed limits for missions may also be reduced.
*Stage 2 Registration Documents are now available! Even if you did not participate in Stage 1, we invite and encourage you to participate in Stage 2. Registration documents can be found here, and if you have questions, please contact us at info@goAEROprize.com.
PRIZE PURSE
The GoAERO Prize Competition will award over $2 million in prizes over three stages. Teams can join the competition at any time and do not need to have participated in previous rounds to compete in the next round. Teams also do not need to win a previous stage prize in order to continue into the next round of the competition, although we encourage Teams to enter sooner rather than later so that they can enjoy the Benefits provided to GoAERO Teams and have the ability to compete to win early-round prizes and publicity.
Prizes will be awarded for each stage of the Competition as follows:
Stage 1
Up to ten $10,000 Stage 1 winners are selected based on a digital-only submission describing the technical approach and project plan.
Stage 2
Up to eight $40,000 Stage 2 winners are selected based on Stage 1 content (with updates for those who participated in Stage 1) plus a show of concept validation.
Stage 3
One $1,000,000 Top Prize awarded for the best overall fly-off score.
Three $150,000 prizes: one for each of the Productivity, Adversity, Maneuvering missions.
One $100,000 RTX Disruptor Prize, awarded for disruptive advancement of the state of the art.
One $100,000 Autonomy Prize.
For Stage 2 and Stage 3 prize winners—and only for prize winners—prior to receiving a prize, the winning Team and GoAERO will enter into the GoAERO Winner’s Equity Agreement. That agreement will provide for GoAERO to receive a small equity interest in the winning Team company. The dollar value of the equity at the time of the award will be no more than the amount of prize money won. There will be no cash payment (beyond the prize amount) by GoAERO to receive the equity; the equity is in consideration for that prize as well as the benefits provided by GoAERO throughout the Competition.
As our GoAERO Teams come from all over the world, are in various stages of development and growth, and are organized in a wide variety of business entity forms, GoAERO will work with each individual prize-winning Team to tailor the equity grant to that Team’s jurisdiction and business set up—but in general, GoAERO expects that it would (i) receive an equity interest in the same class as, or a class that is similar to, that owned by the Team’s founders, in an amount equal to the percentage determined by dividing the amount of prize money won by a Team by the fair value of that Team’s legal entity (as determined jointly by GoAERO and the Team), and (ii) be granted certain typical and customary rights and restrictions with regard to its equity ownership that are customarily agreed to with early-stage equity investors. GoAERO generally expects to be a passive equity holder with an economic interest, and not be involved in Team operations or activities as a result of its equity stake. It is important to note that the actual terms of the equity grant will be negotiated and documented by GoAERO and each winning Team prior to payment of a prize, with the understanding that appropriate terms will vary from Team to Team, but always with the expectation that the value of the equity will be limited by the prize amount won and that the result will be fair and reasonable to both parties. Under no circumstances should this provision be a deterrent to Team participation in the GoAERO Prize Competition, as terms will be negotiated and tailored to each Team’s stage.
See Guidelines above for all rules and requirements for the competition.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Teams will keep all of their intellectual property, except that Teams will grant limited media rights to GoAERO so that GoAERO can publicize and promote the Competition and the Teams. The details relating to media rights are addressed in the Stage I Competition Agreement and the Media Rights Agreement. Other than these media rights, any rights a Team has in its inventions, drawings, patents, designs, copyrights and other intellectual property remain with the Team.
The prize submission information that Teams provide to GoAERO as part of the Competition will only be shared with the Judging Panel and representatives of GoAERO who are involved in administering the Competition. Anyone who has access to a Team’s confidential prize submission information will have signed a confidentiality agreement and agreed not to share or use such confidential information, except as may be required by law. In addition, Teams will not have access to any nonpublic information about other Teams or their technology or performance during the Competition.
INNOVATION INCUBATOR
Even the best and brightest minds can use a little help sometimes. GoAERO empowers innovator teams by providing access to experienced Mentors and Experts in design, engineering, fundraising and law. Teams will have the opportunity to listen to and engage in discussions with the Luminaries of Aerospace and Business in global webinars. Have a couple of questions on conceptual design or configuration management? Looking for insight into cutting edge autonomy techniques? Trying to raise funding to support your build? Expert lectures speak to those disciplines and more. Learn from FAA leads, NASA gurus, Boeing Senior Technical Fellows, and the luminaries who actually wrote the textbooks. Hear about the aerospace fundraising landscape, and take a deep dive into financing decks and pitching VCs. Learn how to protect your intellectual property from patent specialists. A list of Experts along with their bios can be found in the Advisors section.
Starting in Stage 1, when one-on-one help is needed, all Teams will have access to our Mentor program, where Teams work directly with Mentors in their specific areas of need. Operationally, the Mentor program is organized so that Teams contact GoAERO to request a Mentor within a particular discipline. Upon contact, that Team will be matched with a Mentor (or multiple mentors) in that area. During these Mentor sessions, a Team works directly with the Mentor to answer the Team’s specific questions related to their technical build (or financing, or corporate documents, etc.). This is one-on-one support for the Teams, geared to the precise needs of each Team. GoAERO believes that providing this type of support is the best way to help aspiring inventors all over the world create the kind of ground-breaking devices that the Competition seeks.
WHO CAN PARTICIPATE?
GoAERO believes that solutions can come from anyone, anywhere. Scientists, engineers, academics, entrepreneurs, and other innovators with new ideas from all over the world are invited to form a Team and register to compete. To participate, a Team may organize their own members, recruit additional experts to join them, and can add new members at any time throughout the Competition.
To be eligible to participate in the GoAERO Prize, Teams must complete all registration and administration forms, including a short bio for each Team member, certain legal documents, and be accepted by GoAERO into the competition.
For more information, see “Eligibility” below.
TIMELINE AND DELIVERABLES
The GoAERO Prize Competition is a three-year Competition launched on February 6, 2024. There will be three sequential rounds of the Competition.
Comment period
GoAERO solicits and welcomes comments on the Fly-Off rulebook. Use this form to comment.
Stage 1
Digital-only submission describing the technical approach and project plan.
Stage 2
Stage 1 content (with updates for those who participated in Stage 1) plus a show of concept validation.
Stage 3
Final Fly-Off competition featuring three separate missions testing specific skills and capabilities relevant to public good missions
A list of important dates is set forth below:
Description
Date
Competition Launch
Public Comment period opens
February 6, 2024
Public Comment period closes
April 8, 2024
Stage 1 Submission deadline
December 11, 2024
Stage 1 Winners announced
February 11, 2025
Stage 2 Registration deadline
Stage 2 Submission deadline
September 30, 2025
Stage 2 Winners announced
November 18, 2025
Stage 3 Qualifying open
June 5, 2026
Stage 3 Registration deadline
November 4, 2026
Stage 3 Qualifying deadline
December 15, 2026
Final Fly-Off
February 5, 2027
REGISTRATION AND LEGAL DOCUMENTS
To compete in the GoAERO Prize, the participant must be a registered Team that has been approved by GoAERO. Note that the information below is only a summary for your convenience. For full details, please refer to the legal documents for each Stage referred to below.
STAGE 1:
Innovators can compete in Stage 1 both as Individual Innovators and in groups which we refer to as Teams. To begin the registration process for Stage 1 (the Paper Report Stage of the Competition) and be accepted to participate, you must:
Sign the Stage 1 Competition Agreement
Sign the Release of Liability and Indemnification Agreement
Sign the In-kind Sponsor Benefit Agreement
All forms can be found here, and all may be accepted and submitted online.
Submission of the documents will enable access to the Stage 1 submission form for competing. There is no registration fee, but upon submission of a Team’s Stage 1 competition entry, there will be a fee of $250 for Individual Innovators or a fee of $500 for Teams with two or more persons.
STAGE 2 and STAGE 3:
There is a big difference between designing on paper and actual building/flying, so the documents involved for the different Stages of the GoAERO Prize vary as well. In order to proceed from Stage 1 (the paper, technical specifications Stage of the competition) into the actual building (Stages 2 and 3 of the Competition), ALL Teams must submit an additional application and be accepted as a Stage 2 or Stage 3 Team by GoAERO. Under no circumstances should any off-paper work, building or testing take place before a Team is formally admitted into Stage 2 or Stage 3 of the GoAERO Prize. Should any work be done off-paper before being accepted into Stage 2 or Stage 3 in contravention of the foregoing, such work is done entirely outside the scope of the GoAERO Prize.
Prior to the Stage 1 submission deadline, Teams wishing to be considered for acceptance as a competitor in Stage 2 of the Competition (which acceptance will be in the sole discretion of GoAERO) must sign the Extension and Amendment of Stage 1 Competition Agreement (which is attached to the Stage 1 Competition Agreement).
Each Team that participates in Stage 2 and 3 is required to complete the package of legal documents which will govern those Stages of the Competition, including the following:
Of note, Stage 2 and 3 Teams must register and participate as legal entities, and not as individuals. See “Eligibility” below for further details. For complete instructions, review the Stage 2 Registration Documents update; contact GoAERO at with any questions.
FOR ALL STAGES OF THE COMPETITION:
Teams must sign all legal documents and comply with all requirements therein to be admitted to the Competition. Once GoAERO determines that a Team has complied with all requirements of the legal documents and these Competition Guidelines, it will notify the Team that it is approved for entry into the Competition.
Each Team shall designate a Team Member to act as “Team Leader”. The Team Leader will be responsible for communicating with GoAERO and the Judging Panel. The Team Leader (and all Team Members) must be at least 18 years old (or the age of majority in their jurisdiction of residence, if such age is older than 18 years). A Team may add and/or remove Team Members at any time through the Team Portal. The Team has sole responsibility for adding and removing Team Members.
At registration, each Team must list the individuals that are part of the Team (the Team Members), including all individuals or entities involved in the design, development, or testing of the Team’s Submission, including employees. All Team Members must register at the Competition website and sign the Stage 1 Competition Agreement. Teams may add and/or remove Team Members at any time through the Team Portal. The Team has sole responsibility for adding and removing Team Members.
Teams may revise registration information at any time and are responsible for keeping information up to date. All Teams wishing to continue on to Stage 2 and 3 must be legal entities (not individuals) and must complete all Stage 2 and 3 legal documents by the Stage 2 and 3 registration deadlines. New Teams who have not participated in Stage 1 or Stage 2 are still eligible to participate in Stage 3 by completing registration documents by the Stage 3 registration deadline.
As part of this Competition, GoAERO may receive some of the Team’s and Team Members’ personal information. The collection, use, and disclosure of this information will be governed by GoAERO’s Privacy Policy. The Privacy Policy includes several ways to contact GoAERO with questions. By submitting such information, the Team agrees that (i) GoAERO may use the personal information collected as described in the Privacy Policy and (ii) GoAERO may disclose such Team’s and Team Members’ contact information and Competition registration information to Boeing, RTX, other Competition sponsors, and GoAERO’s affiliates and investors. Each Team expressly authorizes each of the foregoing to contact the Team if it so desires. Teams have the right to access, withdraw, and correct their personal information.
ELIGIBILITY
Stage 1 Eligibility:
Individual Innovators: The Competition is open to individual Innovators who (a) are at least 18 years old (or the age of majority in his/her jurisdiction of residence if it is older than 18), (b) comply fully with all terms and conditions of the Stage 1 Competition Agreement, and (c) are able to participate without violation of any third-party rights or obligations, including without limitation an employer’s policies or procedures.
Exclusions: Individual Innovators may not be (a) an employee of Boeing or RTX (or an affiliate) or a member of any such employee’s immediate family, (b) located in a jurisdiction where participation in the Competition is prohibited or otherwise restricted by law (or an individual with a residence in or who is a national of Cuba, Iran, Syria, North Korea, Russia, Sudan or, as applicable, Crimea and covered regions of Ukraine) or (c) subject to export controls or sanctions of the U.S.
Business Entities: The Competition is open to legal entities that wish to compete as a Team and (a) are validly formed and in existence under applicable law, (b) comply fully with all terms and conditions of the Stage 1 Competition Agreement, and (c) are able to participate without violation by the Team or any Team Member of any third-party rights or obligations.
Exclusions: Entity Innovators must not have any presence in Cuba, Iran, Syria, North Korea, Russia, Sudan or, as applicable, Crimea and covered regions of Ukraine, or be subject to export controls or sanctions of the United States.
Stage 2 and Stage 3 Eligibility:
Among other requirements, Stage 2 and 3 of the Competition are only open to business entities that wish to compete as a Team and (a) are validly formed and in existence under applicable law, (b) comply fully with all terms and conditions of the Master Team Agreement, (c) have completed the full package of required legal documents, and (d) are able to participate without violation by the Team or any Team Member of any third-party rights or obligations.
All Team Members must (a) be at least 18 years old (or the age of majority in his/her jurisdiction of residence if it is older than 18), (b) comply fully with all terms and conditions of the Master Team Agreement and all other GoAERO legal documents, and (c) be able to participate without violation of any third-party rights or obligations, including without limitation an employer’s policies or procedures.
Exclusions: A Team Member may not be (a) an employee of Boeing or RTX (or an affiliate) or a member of any such employee’s immediate family, (b) located in a jurisdiction where participation in the Competition is prohibited or otherwise restricted by law (or an individual with a residence in or who is a national of Cuba, Iran, Syria, North Korea, Russia, Sudan or, as applicable, Crimea and covered regions of Ukraine) or (c) subject to export controls or sanctions of the U.S. Additionally, Teams must not have any presence in Cuba, Iran, Syria, North Korea, Russia, Sudan or, as applicable, Crimea and covered regions of Ukraine or be subject to export controls or sanctions of the United States. In all cases, each Team’s legal documents, forms and questionnaires are subject to GoAERO’s review and approval.
Each Team’s compliance with these requirements and eligibility for the Competition will be determined by GoAERO in its sole discretion. Only Teams meeting all of the eligibility requirements set forth in the Master Team Agreement as determined by GoAERO and who are otherwise qualified and accepted by GoAERO will be recognized as participants in the Competition.
Each Team must obey all local, national, and international laws in undertaking any activities related to the Competition. Teams must also acquire all necessary licenses, waivers, and/or permits from the applicable regulatory bodies or other applicable third parties. GoAERO is not required to advise Team regarding such legal and regulatory compliance, and GoAERO shall have no responsibility for a Team’s compliance with laws and disclaims any responsibility for advising on the applicability of laws or regulations or a Team’s compliance therewith. GoAERO’s acceptance of a Team into the Competition does not constitute approval of that Team’s compliance with laws applicable to it.
TEAM SUBMISSIONS
For each Stage of the Competition, Teams will be required to submit the materials and writings described in these Guidelines (“Submissions”). All Submissions must comply with the following requirements:
Except for purchased or licensed content, any Submission must be original work of Team;
Submissions must include only content (including any technical information, algorithms, designs, music, audio, visual or illustrative content, including logos, images, graphics, art, or other content, information, or materials protected by any intellectual property right) that Team owns or has proper rights to use;
Team is required to disclose any purchased or licensed content that is part of a Submission.
Submissions must not contain any incomplete, corrupt, damaged, or malicious material;
Submissions must not contain material that violates or infringes another’s rights, including but not limited to privacy, copyright, trade secret, patent, trademark, publicity or other intellectual property rights;
Submissions must not disparage GoAERO, any Competition sponsor, any GoAERO affiliate or investor or any of their respective affiliates, officers, directors or employees;
Submissions must not contain material that is inappropriate, offensive, indecent, obscene, tortious, defamatory, slanderous or libelous and must not contain material that promotes bigotry, racism, hatred or harm against any group or individual or promotes discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation, or age; and
Submissions must not contain material that is unlawful, in violation of, or contrary to laws or regulations.
JUDGING PANEL
INDEPENDENT JUDGING PANEL
No Judge, nor any member of Judge’s immediate family, shall participate in any Team. All members of the Judging Panel will promptly disclose to GoAERO any such current, former, or expected future conflict of interest with GoAERO, Boeing, RTX and/or any Team or Team Member.
ROLE OF THE JUDGING PANEL
The duties and responsibilities of the Judging Panel will include, but not be limited to: (i) evaluating a Teams’ compliance with the Master Team Agreement, these Competition Guidelines, and the Rules and Regulations for the purposes of the Competition; and (ii) the awarding of points and selection of Teams that will receive prizes for each Stage of the Competition.
GROUNDS FOR JUDGING PANEL DECISIONS
Official decisions made by the Final Round Judging Panel will be approved by a majority of the Judges that vote on such decision after careful consideration of the testing protocols, procedures, guidelines, rules, regulations, criteria, results, and scores set forth in the Master Team Agreement and these Competition Guidelines. If any vote of the Judges results in a tie, then the Judging Panel shall determine, in its sole and absolute discretion, the mechanism to settle the tie. Similarly, if one or more Teams are tied at any stage during the competition, the Judging Panel shall have the sole and absolute discretion to settle the tie.
DECISIONS OF THE JUDGING PANEL ARE FINAL
The Judging Panel shall have sole and absolute discretion: (i) to allocate duties among the Judges; (ii) to determine the degree of accuracy and error rate that is acceptable to the Judging Panel for all competition calculations, measurements, and results, where not specified in the Rules and Regulations; (iii) to determine the methodology used by the Judging Panel to render its decisions; (iv) to declare the winners of the competition; and (v) to award the prize purses and other awards. Decisions of the Judging Panel shall be binding on Teams and each Team Member. Teams agree not to dispute any decision or ruling of the Judging Panel, including decisions regarding the degree of accuracy or error rate of any competition calculations, measurements, and results. Teams shall have no right to observe other Teams’ testing or evaluation, or to be informed of other Teams’ calculations, measurements, and results, unless such information is made publicly available by GoAERO.
OFFICIAL LANGUAGE AND CURRENCY
The official language of the Competition is English. All communications with GoAERO must be in English. All references to currency are expressed in United States Dollars (USD).
Global Leader in Computational Intelligence Provides Full-Suite Access to Support Life-Saving Aircraft Development
We're excited to announce a new In-Kind Sponsor, Altair, a global leader in computational intelligence providing software and cloud solutions in simulation, high-performance computing (HPC), data analytics, and AI. Altair will provide all GoAERO teams with free access to their full suite of state-of-the-art simulation software, empowering teams to design and build cutting-edge Emergency Response Flyers.
Altair has long been a thought-leader in AI-powered Engineering solutions for the aerospace and defense industry. So, we are pleased to support the teams competing for the GoAERO prize and their ambitious and inspiring mission of Saving Lives by pushing the boundaries of autonomous systems for aviation” said Jim Ryan, VP, Global Academic Program at Altair.
Accelerating the Development of Life-Saving Aircraft
By providing teams with professional-grade simulation and design tools, Altair is enabling more efficient, lightweight, and aerodynamically optimized aircraft designs—ultimately accelerating the development of vehicles that will save lives during natural disasters, medical emergencies, and humanitarian crises.
Key Software Tools Available to Teams
GoAERO teams will gain access to Altair's suite of design and simulation tools, including:
Altair® FlightStream® for aerodynamic simulation and rapid design exploration, providing invaluable insights into aircraft performance while minimizing complexity and time compared to traditional CFD solvers
Altair® Inspire™ for simulation-driven design and optimization, allowing teams to easily perform structural analyses, topology optimization (for lightweighting), and motion studies on their aircraft
Altair® PSIM™ for power electronics and motor drive design with a comprehensive circuit analysis and electric machine optimization platform featuring an intuitive drag-and-drop interface
Beyond the software itself, teams will also have access to training videos, webinar recordings, and tutorials created specifically to help users get started quickly and successfully.
When an ambulance struggled to reach a medical emergency in rural Hungary last summer, Valter Somlai witnessed firsthand the critical gaps in emergency capabilities. “It took forever for the ambulance to arrive, and then it didn’t even have the proper equipment to handle the situation,” he recalls. “And trying to land a helicopter wasn’t feasible because of all the trees.”
This experience reinforced what Valter and his Team Elevate Delft co-captain Maan Pandya already believed: “There is no point in doing this without such a mission.”
For these Delft University of Technology students, “this” refers to the humanitarian purpose of the global GoAERO challenge. Their team is one of hundreds working to develop a new generation of flyers that can effectively deploy to save lives in extreme weather disasters, urgent healthcare situations, and other emergencies currently inaccessible to rescue and response vehicles such as helicopters, drones, and firetrucks.
Valter, 21, and Maan, 20, are both completing their undergraduate degrees in aerospace engineering at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Together, they lead a team of nearly 20 students united in what they acknowledge is a Herculean effort to build their flyer.
“There are a lot of challenges – finding the money, space to work, time, sponsors, and more,” Maan explains. “So, it has taken a lot of persuasion to convince people that we can successfully make this work. But we are all very motivated, not just to build an eVTOL but to do so because we want to help save lives.”
The team is even more motivated than ever because it was recently named one of 11 winners of GoAERO’s Stage 1, which recognized its flyer design.
“Some of us live in the same place, so from the moment we found out we won, we started celebrating,” Valter exclaims. “It was a really nice moment.”
Maan echoes this sentiment, adding that being named a Stage 1 winner “was totally unexpected. But it is nice that all our efforts were fruitful in the end.”
This shared success has further strengthened the bonds within the team. Maan and Valter are good friends and “bench mates” in their studies, so “we share a lot of interests and experiences.”
They share a unique goal for their GoAERO emergency response flyer: to make it foldable. “We want it to be compact and easily transportable so it can fit into the back of a truck, if necessary,” Maan notes. “And it will be autonomous with remote oversight, allowing a human operator to monitor and intervene when needed.”
Conversations with their local fire department shaped their vision for the vehicle. What’s notable is that what the fire personnel described as the most essential components and capabilities for a prospective emergency response flyer were “exactly what we were already considering and working on,” Valter relates.
Both Valter and Maan are honors students at Delft. Valter is performing research in Particle Image Velocimetry and has participated in numerous group projects designing various types of aircraft. It was through one of these projects that he began developing his leadership skills as well as experience in building an eVTOL. He will soon have his first internship at Rocket Factory Augsburg as a GNC (guidance, navigation, and control) engineer to gain more experience in the aerospace industry.
While Valter focuses on physical testing and aircraft design, his co-captain brings complementary skills to the team. Maan -- who lived in India, where he regularly saw the problems emergency responders faced due to constant traffic congestion -- explains that his academic interests are more geared towards utilizing computational and mathematical concepts for aerospace. For his honors thesis, he is working on “a machine learning method for repositioning agents in a swarm to capture accurate reconstruction of any field described by a time-dependent PDE (partial differential equation).”
Beyond academics, he is interested in entrepreneurship and was selected as one of Delft’s representatives for the IDEA League challenge program. He traveled to universities throughout Europe to learn new strategies for implementing ideas in real life and connecting with like-minded individuals. Prior to GoAERO, he worked with AeroDelft, a student team, assembling a full-scale hydrogen aircraft.
Maan’s interest in aircraft and aerospace engineering is rooted in his childhood. Both of his parents are engineers, and “like many kids my age, I was always really excited by fast things. This included fast cars, planes, rockets and everything else that is fast. My path to aerospace was natural. Even so, I was into cars more. But aerospace engineering is a more specialized field with many more challenges to be addressed, especially in the current day. Emergency rescue was not the challenge on my mind, but after understanding the problem, I do see the need and have developed an interest in using my skills for impactful advancements.”
While Valter liked science growing up, it wasn’t until high school that he “started seeing and reading content and watching YouTube videos about the engineering processes behind iconic aircraft” that his interest in aerospace engineering was fully sparked.
“I chose this major due to its challenging but inspiring nature,” he says. “Additionally, because the aerospace industry is always on the cutting-edge of technology and continuously advancing, it is a very dynamic and exciting area to work in.”
Valter is drawn to pioneers in the industry such as Elon Musk, Burt Rutan, and Kelly Johnson, “who have the courage to do things differently, break boundaries and change people’s perception about what is possible.
Maan also draws inspiration from people like Musk – “people who are not afraid to fail in the process of driving change are the ones who inspire me regardless of their industry.”
Both co-captains also draw inspiration from unlikely sources. “It may not be so surprising that as an aerospace engineering student I love to spend some of my free time using Microsoft Flight Simulator,” Valter says, noting that in this year’s edition, “you can perform rescue missions in a simulation environment with multiple types of vehicles and many scenarios. Although it is not the same as in real life, it can still be useful to get a better idea of the process and about design aspects you wouldn’t think of otherwise.”
For Maan, inspiration comes from something a little more old-school and pedestrian. “I’m not sure how common this is, but I actually used to be really into paper airplanes,” he notes. “I used to sit down and look up different world record builds and try to see if I could get anything close to it. It definitely allowed me to get a rough idea of how planes worked.”
Beyond their individual motivations, the co-captains recognize the importance fo guidance in their ambitious project. The co-captains are fortunate that at Delft they have numerous mentors, including Professor Daniele Ragni, whose attitude towards tackling projects is “really refreshing. He taught us to get to the point of things, both in terms of the design process and presenting it in our report. He also stresses focusing on what really matters and how to not waste time in group projects. This gave us a feeling of him being a big brother and mentor.”
With this mentorship and the insights gained from GoAERO’s Expert Lectures, the team continues to expand their understanding of eVTOL development. They’re rapidly building their expertise through hands-on experience and guidance from industry leaders. Their vision extends beyond just creating another aircraft -- as Maan says without hesitation, “with our flyer, we aim to democratize emergency rescue.”
To highlight your GoAERO Team, contact us at info@goaeroprize.com.
REMINDER: Stage 2 Registration Documents are available here.
When one is working to develop a new class of flying vehicles that can more effectively respond to emergencies caused by wildfires, hurricanes and other extreme weather catastrophic events or by urban traffic snarls that are inaccessible by helicopter, drone or ambulance, having a name that literally suggests mobility seems particularly fitting. That’s the case for Dr. Moble Benedict.
In fact, Moble is the name of the captain of Team Harmony, the joint entry of Texas A&M University and Oklahoma State University in the global GoAERO challenge. This alliance brings together complementary expertise from these two engineering programs – traditional rivals in athletics but united in their pursuit of developing innovative emergency response flyers. By combining their resources and technical knowledge, this cross-state team is leveraging their collective experience in aircraft design and testing to address critical challenges in disaster response and rescue operations.
Does having a name that is defined by “being able to move or be moved freely and easily” provide a competitive advantage to Team Harmony? Well, the eight-person team has been named one of 11 GoAERO’s Stage 1 winners, as well as one of 14 awardees receiving funds from GoAERO with support from NASA’s University Innovation Project.
“We are grateful for this recognition and the funding that comes with it,” says Dr. Benedict, associate professor of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M, who has authored more than 120 papers on aviation and aerospace-related subjects and holds 12 patents for work including vertical take-off and landing vehicles, and who previously led Team Harmony to Stage 1 and 2 wins in the GoFly competition, the global challenge to create personal flyers that preceded GoAERO. “The prizes will help us financially to build and flight test our subscale prototype to understand the dynamics and control of our novel aircraft concept, as well as de-risk the control strategy prior to the full-scale prototype flight tests. This knowledge will help us towards our GoAero Phase 2 submission.”
Dr. David Coleman, a post-doctoral researcher of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M who has more than a decade of experience in designing, developing, and flight testing both traditional and novel vertical flight aircraft, including serving as chief engineer on the GoFly team, adds that Harmony was looking for “opportunities to use some of the flyers we’ve already prototyped for real life, practical experiences. GoAERO is the perfect combination of opportunity and critically important mission.”
GoAERO’s humanitarian mission served as the impetus for Dr. Atanu Halder’s involvement in the initiative. “We’re always looking both to advance VTOL technology and to use these advances to serve and benefit society. Both aspects, the business and the service, motivates and excites us,” says the assistant professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Oklahoma State who has more than 10 years of experience in rotorcraft aeromechanics, unsteady aerodynamics, and nonlinear aeroelasticity, was the chief aerodynamic designer of the team’s GoFly vehicle, and was Dr. Benedict’s student at Texas A&M.
The combination of technology and mission is manifested in the design of the Team Harmony flyer, according to Amit Gadag, a PhD student at Texas A&M specializing in the design and development of autonomy-capable unmanned autonomous vehicles and whose research combines experimental analysis, including bench-top, wind tunnel, and flight testing, “to iteratively optimize eVTOL UAVs for peak performance.”
To achieve that peak performance, he says, “the team is building a novel, fully autonomous two-bladed rotor eVTOL aircraft capable of long-range, agile high-speed flight, as well as quick deployment for rapid response in emergency scenarios and crises faster than ever before.”
“Importantly, it will fit into the back of a commercially available trailer or truck, so all you would have to do is put it in the back of a truck, plug in the batteries, and fly,” Amit adds.
Dr. Benedict points out that extreme weather patterns and climate events have skyrocketed in the past half-century, while the U.S. response capabilities have remained largely stagnant, leaving millions vulnerable.
“So, major engineering breakthroughs are needed to disrupt the status quo in aerial emergency rescue and disaster relief efforts,” he stresses. “Without these innovations, the nation must continue to rely on helicopters for all search and rescue efforts. Although helicopters have been doing this for the past 80 years, success has been limited since many areas are unreachable, the rescues are very challenging, and helicopters have high acquisition and operating costs, not to mention a shortage of pilots. Furthermore, drone technology is too limited in size and scope to be utilized for rescue operations.”
It seems that Dr. Benedict has been thinking about developing such a breakthrough since he was a child growing up – and not just because of his very appropriate first name. His father was a mechanical engineering professor in India. “And I always wanted to be an inventor. I always was interested in how things worked – cars, ships, airplanes, rockets."
His interest was piqued when he took his first ride in an airplane, a Cessna, in India. The first time he was ever aboard a commercial airplane was when he came to the U.S. to begin his PhD at the University of Maryland, having completed his undergraduate work at IIT Bombay. While studying for his Ph.D., he was exposed to helicopters and other VTOLs; he did his thesis on a Cyclo-copter, an aircraft first ideated about 100 years ago. Often characterized as an “aerial paddleboat,” it has two or four cycloidal rotors to provide lift, propulsion and control. There is also a propeller to keep the aircraft level.
Dr. Coleman may have grown up across the world from his colleague, in his case Plano, Texas, but he shared a “passion for flying things as a very young kid. I was always watching take-offs and landings from Dallas Fort Worth International Airport. And many flightpaths went right over our house.
Drs. Coleman and Benedict met while at Maryland, and when Dr. Benedict went to Texas A&M, “I followed him for my post-doctoral work,” relates the self-described “avid bird watcher.” He notes that this “work” involved a National Science Foundation-funded project to build a robotic hummingbird “to understand flight dynamics. Hummingbirds are so unique. No other birds fly this way. They can hover, fly upside down, and move in many directions just by adjusting the angle of their wings and tail, attributes similar to how a VTOL flies.
Like Dr. Coleman, Amit – the son of teachers, his dad of finance, his mom of physics – grew up “fascinated by how things worked. I was always taking things apart just to see how they operated.”
But he didn’t engage in any real practical experiences in aviation or aerospace until he was selected to work in Dr. Benedict’s lab. He admits, though, that at the beginning, “I didn’t even know how to use an Allen wrench (Hex key)!”
Dr. Halder’s interests as a kid were totally dissimilar from those of his teammates. He acknowledges he knew nothing about aerospace engineering. “I wanted to be a soccer player, but I wasn’t good enough to be a professional. But I was good at numbers.” This aptitude for mathematics eventually led him toward engineering, where his computational skills could be applied to more complex aerodynamic challenges.
Nevertheless, as with all the Team Harmony members – who also include A&M Ph.D. students Reuben-Wayne Stewart and Vishnu Sai, and Ph.D. student Pedram Dabaghian and master’s degree student Ripon Sarker at OSU -- it was working in Dr. Benedict’s lab at Texas A&M that he first began immersing himself in the world of aviation and aerospace engineering. “That’s what really motivated me to learn to build and fly aircrafts,” he explains.
In fact, Team Harmony was formed by bringing together the five graduate students and the post-doc from Texas A&M and OSU. This strategic collaboration maximizes their collective experience in designing, building, and flight-testing VTOL UAVs. It also leverages their expertise in rotor design and the simulation of novel UAV configurations to enhance autonomy capabilities.
While they come from two different universities, which are longtime rivals in intercollegiate athletics, they are fully united in their passion for using their engineering skills and expertise to develop innovative aircraft solutions for many different applications pertaining to emergency response and rescue scenarios.
In other words, to fulfill the requirements of the GoAERO challenge!
To highlight your GoAERO Team, contact us at info@goaeroprize.com.
REMINDER: Stage 2 Registration Documents are available here.
From piloting gliders to pioneering autonomous aircraft for emergency response, Rachel Axten is charting an innovative course in aviation and aerospace engineering. Now a Ph.D. candidate in the Penn State University Unmanned Aircraft Systems Research Laboratory (PURL), Rachel combines her passion for flight with cutting-edge engineering to develop technologies that could revolutionize emergency response operations.
I have always been interested in the pilot-aircraft interaction,” says Rachel, who holds both a private pilot’s license for single-engine aircraft and considers gliding her favorite flying experience. “Luckily, Penn State is located near excellent spots for ridge soaring, so I plan to work towards that rating next.”
Her journey through aerospace began at Penn State’s Aerospace Department, where she earned her bachelor’s and master’s degrees. While she initially considered a career as a pilot, her fascination with the technical aspects of flight led her down an engineering path that would allow her to shape the future of aviation technology.
This path has led to her current role as the principal of Penn State’s team in the global GoAERO challenge, where she’s working to develop a new category of emergency response flying vehicles that can overcome the limitations of current-day helicopters and drones. “My advisor and colleagues at PURL build flight software for uncrewed aircraft systems, so applying that to public safety tasks is exciting,” Rachel explains. “We are especially enthusiastic about this opportunity to demonstrate autonomy that enables robust operation in unknown environments that are currently hazardous to Emergency Medical Services teams.”
She is not the only member of the Penn State team who is very excited about GoAERO. In fact, they are all “over the moon” about the team’s selection as one of 11 winners of GoAERO’s Stage 1 and one of 14 awardees receiving funds from GoAERO with support from NASA’s University Innovation project.
“This really means a lot to us,” says team member Dr. Eric Johnson, a professor in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Penn State and director of PURL, where he is Rachel’s advisor. “It gives us confidence that we are meeting the GoAERO requirements while also advancing our ‘storyline’ – that we are on the right track with what we have conceived.”
What the team has conceived is SWIFT, an unmanned aircraft system designed as an easy-to-deploy and easy-to-operate heavy-lift system suited for various public safety missions. It features a fully autonomous waypoint following with collision avoidance protection and landing zone selection with minimum operator inputs, while also enabling faster response times, larger payload capacities, and safer operations for all crew members responding to emergencies, explains Dr. Johnson.
He, himself, has performed research in adaptive flight control, aided inertial navigation, and autonomous systems. He was the lead system integrator for rotorcraft experiments for the DARPA Software Enabled Control program, which included the first air launch of a hovering aircraft, the automatic flight of a helicopter with a simulated frozen actuator, and adaptive flight control.
“I’ve wanted to be an aerospace engineer since I was only 10 years old,” Dr. Johnson relates, humbly omitting that 30 years ago his life ambition was already bearing fruit for him: he was a member of the winning team in an MIT-sponsored competition that created one of the world’s first GPS-guided helicopters.
The Penn State team member Venkat Iyer had similar ambitions since his childhood in India. The Ph.D. candidate in PURL says, “I’ve always enjoyed making things that fly, the more complex the better, from helicopters to control center systems.”
After receiving his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Mumbai University, Venkat worked as a rotorcraft system engineer at Hindustan Aeronautics Limited in India, where he oversaw the design and certification of avionics systems. At Penn State, from where he received his master’s degree, he is currently engaged in advancing vision-based navigation techniques for unmanned aerial systems.
“I can’t imagine not doing this,” exclaims Venkat, of GoAERO. “After meeting recently with First Responders, the humanitarian mission of the competition became even more important. It motivates me to want to do even better.”
For Rachel, it is the increasingly intense natural disaster events, including hurricanes and wildfires, that “motivate the technologies we seek to accomplish. Moving large payloads or providing situational awareness to a ground response team without risking an onboard crew is always critical in these events.”
To achieve this goal, the Penn State team will rely on its vast experience in all aspects of developing UAS and VTOL aircrafts. Of equal if not more importance to Rachel, she has already gained valuable experience in building and testing emergency response flyers. Since 2019, she has competed with a team of Penn State graduate students in the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Public Safety Communications Research Division UAS First Responder Challenges, where they have won more than $370,000. These challenges have been related to small UAS across public safety tasks, including search-and-rescue, security, indoor navigation, and 3D mapping.
“Our interaction with public safety partners, especially at the NIST Final Fly-Off events, has been incredibly motivating as we seek to build useful drone products to improve public safety response,” Rachel exclaims.
Speaking of Final Fly-Offs, Rachel and her teammates are already looking ahead to having a large-scale platform to integrate and further test the software elements required for GoAERO’s ultimate challenge.
Yet, even with the team’s Stage 1 success and the funding that comes with it, as well as through the NASA University Innovation Project award, Rachel acknowledges that there are still barriers to overcome, the biggest, without a doubt, is “time. As this is a university team, building the right team willing to put in the time for a competition like this is always a challenge.”
The core team is solid but is also recruiting more students. “Luckily, the GoAERO Prize is itself a motivator,” Rachel says, adding that they have a large group of qualified faculty and students who are a part of the Penn State Vertical Lift Research Center of Excellence from which to recruit.
To this end, other team members include Dr. Vitor T. Valente, a native of Brazil who is an assistant researcher in PURL, where he is currently investigating a new flight control system design for multirotor vehicles focused on reducing the acoustic noise generated while in flight; Ani Perumalla, currently pursuing a Ph.D. in aerospace engineering whose interests include computer vision techniques and collision avoidance for unmanned systems; Samay Shingatwar, Ethan Shakour, Ishan Haque, and Aum Dave.
In the meantime, the team members continue to expand their aeronautic, aviation, and engineering knowledge and hone their skills through experiential education opportunities, such as those in which Rachel was involved during her undergraduate days. She participated in a human-powered aircraft project in a freshman-senior class and competed on Penn State’s AIAA Design, Build, Fly team. She also completed three internships with the Boeing Company across different disciplines, including flight test operations, wind tunnel testing, and satellite guidance, navigation and control (GNC). More recently, she’s been an intern at the NASA Langley Dynamic Systems & Control Branch, where she works on advanced flight control related to Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) aircraft.
Aviation runs in Rachel’s family. Her father, a retired US Navy Test Pilot who now works as a Test Pilot at Sikorsky Aircraft, helped spark her early interest in flight through small airplane and helicopter rides these. Experiences would later influence her specific interest in flight control design.
Throughout these experiences and her educational pursuits, Rachel notes she’s been fortunate to have a strong family foundation – in addition to her parents, she has a devoted husband and a child – and wonderful mentors to guide and counsel her. These include her high school math and science teachers “who encouraged my studies and set me up well for my undergraduate studies”; her mentors at Boeing, including Jason Zonca and Mat Rueger; her current NASA team, including Dr. Irene Gregory; and the Penn State Aerospace Engineering faculty, including her graduate advisor, Dr. Eric Johnson, her undergraduate advisor, Dr. Mark Maughmer, and Dr. Namiko Yamamoto.
Rachel declares, “I owe them and many others for much of my success, for their instruction, patience, and mentoring over my academic career. I wouldn’t be where I am today without them.”
To highlight your GoAERO Team, contact us at info@goaeroprize.com.
REMINDER: Stage 2 Registration Documents are available here.
World's Largest Servo Manufacturer Offers 35% Discount to Support Life-Saving Aircraft Development
We're excited to announce a new In-Kind Sponsor, Hitec, the world's largest servo manufacturer and market leader in servos for unmanned systems. Hitec will provide all GoAERO teams with a significant 35% discount on published pricing for servos and chargers.
Hitec produces more than 150 models of servos. As an NDAA Compliant and ISO 9001 Certified company, Hitec handles all manufacturing in-house.
“We are honored to sponsor and empower GoAERO in their ongoing mission to provide life-saving, emergency-response advanced aircraft by providing high-performance, cutting-edge servo actuator technology and support,” said Shawn Spiker, Hitec Commercial Solutions, Sales Director. “Together, we will create a future where every effort counts, and every innovation makes a difference.”
Accelerating the Development of Life-Saving Aircraft
The addition of Hitec to the list of GoAERO In-Kind sponsors represents another step forward in GoAERO's mission to revolutionize emergency response through advanced aerial technology. By reducing the cost of essential components, we're helping teams focus more resources on innovation and testing—ultimately accelerating the development of aircraft that will save lives during natural disasters, medical emergencies, and humanitarian crises.