menu

Submission

submission voting
voting is closed.
introduction
title
The Strategy Matrix/Outcome Harvester
short description
The Strategy Matrix/Outcome Harvesting is a unique evaluation methodology for complex projects
About the Team
Full Name(s)
Charles Abani
Lydia Odeh
Jennifer Onyejekwe
Position(s)
Chief of Party
Deputy Chief of Party
Public Awareness and Communications Advisor
Chemonics RBU / Division
West Africa and Haiti
Project Name
Strengthening Advocacy and Civic Engagement (SACE)
Affiliated Technical Practices/Department
Democracy and Governance
Tell the Story
What was the development problem the team was trying to solve?
Evaluating progress and effectiveness of advocacy efforts and making real-time adjustments to get results is notoriously tricky. A key challenge is to keep the strategies ‘live’ – taking account of the changing political economy context, the constant wave of changes to key stakeholders and players, responding to windows of opportunities, learning and working flexibly, nimbly and innovatively – embracing complexity.

Mapping and tracking progress and developing strategic responses is critical to success. The project has been developing and evolving a framework (the Strategy Matrix/Outcome Harvester) that enables partner-clusters to build a common agenda, revisit strategy in the changing context, harvest and validate outcomes as they occur and discuss next steps and priorities, thus escaping the constraints of more rigid and linear tools.
What makes your project implementation unique or special?
SACE is currently supporting 15 advocacy clusters leading collective impact initiatives to improve government accountability across such sectors as education, health, and extractives at both the National level and in the Niger Delta. A cluster is defined as a group of organizations working on a clearly defined thematic issue-area to promote citizen and government accountability. Each cluster includes an Anchor organization, which is led by an entity that embraces the principles of servant leadership. Each cluster is working along the principles of collective impact, to develop a shared agenda for change, mutually aligned activities across members, continuous communication, and shared measurement. All clusters collectively include over 100 organisations within the SACE program. Each organisation has recorded activities, outputs and interim outcomes which are evaluated using the Outcome Harvester which SACE has adapted to support and track cluster projects and milestones.
Technical Details
What is the name of the technology or initiative? If it doesn’t have a name, please create one
The Strategy Matrix/Outcome Harvester
What country(s) was the technology implemented in?
Nigeria
What technology category does your technology fall under, if any?
Other
What dates did the technology implementation take place?
September 2015 till date
Please describe the technology that was used to enhance the project development impact
The Strategy Matrix/Outcome Harvesting is a unique evaluation methodology which aids in tracking and collating multiple actions, outputs and interim outcomes on a complex project. It is an evolving map that aims to increase awareness, commitment, and action among different types of audiences by cluster actions and outcomes. How the cluster chooses to carry out actions around their issues depends on strategies and tactics which are captured on the Harvester map. The system tracks and evaluates reported information from partners on their engagement. These information is tracked mainly through a tool called cluster coaching and other information sharing platforms such as the Annual Learning Summit, weekly and quarterly reports. All stories and information are reviewed and coded for patterns and learning on Cluster’s performance and to support further capacity development, public engagement and public awareness actions.
Please describe the outcomes of using the described technology (higher development impact, better decision making, cost effectiveness, other)
The Strategy Matrix/Outcome Harvester makes project strategizing, re-strategizing, monitoring, evaluation and tracking easy. It ensures all cluster members are on the same page, have a shared goals with assigned roles. It fosters the collective impact approach as cluster members are aware of their roles in contributing to meeting democratic key reform with and without program funding. It helps independent evaluators to follow the project progress – with a ‘map’ of the connections between activities and outcomes – as the coding helps to track progress and complexities and ensure progress beyond the project life time. The tool is cost effective, shows a clear journey map, highlights what strategies and tactics achieved high results for onward replication; and ensures everyone understands project priorities and responsibilities going forward. This tool can be used on any project as it guides in making informed systematic decisions and evaluate project development impacts.
Were there any challenges in implementation of the technology? Please describe any lessons learned
The Strategy Matrix/Outcome Harvester though complex methodology is easy to understand and replicate. The approach to Outcome Harvesting is very inclusive that every member of the cluster understands the journey mapped.

Initially the 'coding' was technical for clusters to understand, but with practice and training it became easier and they each apply have set up an Outcome Harvester grid in their offices.
Is this technology project-specific, or could it be replicated to enhance other projects? Please respond to the best of your ability.
The Strategy Matrix/Outcome Harvester works best in achieving clarity in complex multi-prong projects and can be used for governance projects as it aids in documenting intangible outcomes as compared to service delivery projects.
Supporting Documents - Visual Aids
Outcome Harvester Matrix.pdf
Additional Supporting Documents (optional)
Outcome Harvester Matrix.pdf

comments (public)